I cannot make this shit up: The BBC Barfs Again

In one egregious headline, the BBC accuses American patriots of being mindless automatons and President Trump a master puppeteer.

Despite what the leftist, globalist elites want you to think, President Trump did not organize, nor can he stop AMERICAN CITIZENS FROM EXERCISING THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PROTEST. Envy, you bet! It is just too damn bad your own citizens are denied the inalienable rights given to man by God. Good night to all the fake journos at the BBNPC. Go protest soy shortages.

I am calling bullshit here. You cannot trust the BBC

Misleading BBC Headline Implies President Trump Might Be Able to Delay Election Day

Can President Trump delay election day?

The easy answer to the BBC’s question is, “No, President Trump cannot delay election day.”

After Fake News, anti-American journo, Anthony Zurcher, implied Trump just might be able to legally extend his first term as president in this headline, he quickly answers his own disingenuous and false question:

(Of course he can’t) Under a law dating back to 1845, the US presidential election is slated for the Tuesday after the first Monday of November every four years – 3 November in 2020. It would take an act of Congress – approved by majorities in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives and the Republican-controlled Senate – to change that.

What a tit.

In recent days I have easily made the case that not a day goes by where the Barely British Corp does not mislead its readers with fearmongering, anti-American headlines, and Fake News journalism. So what exactly is the BBC? Well, according to the UK Government:

The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) is a British public service broadcaster. Its main responsibility is to provide impartial public service broadcasting in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man.

The BBC is primarily funded through fees paid by citizens, and both regular and irregular migrants, residing in the UK. It is under the thumb of the government. So how is it that the fake journos at the BBC are allowed to skew their view so far left that ‘impartial public service’ turns into bias opinion? I believe there has been a petty, century-long desire within the UK’s elites to knock America down a notch or two. They hate President Trump because he wants to Make America Great Again and Keep America Great. He is not playing the globalist game that leftists like President Obama and the Clintons do. He does not capitulate. So, through the BBC, UK elites take daily shots at America and Trump to skew, not only the opinion of people in the UK, but all the citizens on Earth. That is a real, verifiable, attempt to interfere in American elections.

I am calling bullshit here. You cannot trust the BBC

The BBC Suppresses Sexual Assault Allegations Against Joe Biden

It took Tara Reade a year of indecision to finally come forward and publicly describe her sexual assault by then-senator Joe Biden. A terrifying endeavor considering the ease with which America’s progressive left destroys people. The alleged assault took place in 1993 when she was a staffer with the then fifty year old senator. She finally told of the events to the best of her ability in March of 2020. Ms. Reade’s allegations are far more articulate and verifiable than those of Christine Blasey Ford’s imaginings, yet the left-wing, fake news media is ignoring the accusations in total.

You have to ask yourself, with all of Joe Biden’s perv behavior, why does the BBC give him a pass? Are they meddling in our election process?

After devoting hundreds of articles to the Brett Kavanaugh/Christine Balsey Ford story, along with a desperate attempt to link President Trump to sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein rather than Epstein pal, Bill Clinton, the Barely British news Corporation is frozen crickets when it comes to sexual assault and harassment allegations against presidential candidate, Joe Biden. Why? It suits their anti-Trump agenda.

The BBC published dozens of articles about allegations against President Trump.

Reade’s experience with the now demented, hair sniffing, Joe Biden has been completely ignored by the Barely British Corp. Why? Because the BBC is a leftist, globalist organization that despises all Constitutional, conservative thinking. That’s why. Rather than reporting the news in an unbiased fashion, they are ignoring this story because they want Biden to win the election. Biden was not always organically senile. He used to be a top-flight predator, and now the BBC is covering for him because they hate Donald Trump. Don’t believe me? Just wait.

I am calling bullshit here. You cannot trust the BBC.

BBC Mocks American Pastor’s Death

Leftist BBC implies karmic justice in this mean-spirited headline

It is time to start calling out the leftist, tabloid rag, BBC News. On a daily basis their writers and editors mock, belittle and outright lie about American conservatives and Christians. Here is a prime example. A good man, a Christian pastor, with a beautiful family, who tragically dies from Covid-19. While his family is grieving and coping with the loss of their father and husband, the sanctimonious, progtards at the BBC could not help but take a shot at the man. In a compulsive fit, BBC writer Aleem Maqbool could not stop himself from making barbed comments about Pastor Spradlin as well as taking a shot at President Trump.

‘Even as he was sick, he posted on social media about “hysteria” surrounding the virus.

On the 13th of March Pastor Spradlin shared on Facebook a misleading post comparing swine flu and coronavirus deaths.

It suggested that Barack Obama and Donald Trump respectively had been treated very differently by the media and that it was a politically motivated ploy to harm President Trump.

Earlier the very same day, the president himself had insinuated something very similar at a news conference.’

It was a cruel ‘gotcha’ article and it made the BBC’s front page for a day. It served no newsworthy purpose except to imply Pastor Spradlin got what he deserved. I have had enough of this leftist, progressive shit.

I am calling bullshit here. You cannot trust the BBC

In a Fit of Anti-Judeo-Christian Bigotry, the BBC Renames Christianity and Insults 1/3 of Earth’s Population

That’s right folks. England’s BBC just renamed Christianity. Church of England? To Hell with them. Protestants? Screw you. Catholics? Do not get them started. Not to mention that Abrahamic religions, with all their divisions and conflicts, are now in the BBC’s iron-sights. You have all been recategorized by a news organization that is still breast feeding America’s childish CNN. You are are all now AntiLGBTians. You heard it here second. England’s BBC reported it first. What a bunch of bigots.

Its extreme leftist agenda revealed, the BBC goes after Christian school teachers world-wide.

The BBC Intentionally Misleads Global Readership about Guns and Violence in America

PROMISES BROKEN

I promise. Two simple, yet powerful words. I swear. My solemn oath. The ‘promise’ is the most common form of contract known to man, and holds sway from the least of children to the greatest of leaders. Yet it is entirely unenforceable, for there is no controlling legal authority beyond the character of the promise maker. In politics the solemn oath of office is a satirical farce. The citizen knows the politician has no intention of keeping any promise or oath. For instance, in the United States, every politician swears to uphold and defend the Constitution, and then relentlessly attempts to subvert it. Why? The Constitution interferes with the politician’s ability to force their personal agenda upon an unwilling population.

The ‘promise’ is also the foundation of journalistic integrity. A journalist’s power is found solely in their integrity. Journalists want their readers to believe they are credible, so they promise to be truthful and adhere to a code of ethics and fairness. Like politicians, journalists spend a huge amount of resources maintaining the illusion of honesty and integrity. Unfortunately, with no controlling legal authority, journalists, like politicians, often undermine public enlightenment with falsehoods and misinformation. Why? The truth often interferes with the journalist’s ability to force their personal agenda upon an unwilling population.

THE BATTLEFIELD

From the Japanese internment during WWII to Obamacare, America’s history is rife with constitutional battles pitting the U.S. government against We The People. Today’s constitutional battle pits the majority of American citizens, who believe in the inherent value of the 2nd Amendment, against opportunistic politicians seeking to diminish the citizen’s right to bear arms. In this battle American politicians find themselves with a new and extraordinarily powerful ally, the British Broadcasting Corporation. The BBC’s journalists bring with them a finely crafted cloak of global integrity, a bully pulpit, if you will. The citizens of our world trust that the BBC will demonstrate the highest integrity in it reporting, so when the BBC sides with forces seeking to subvert the Constitution of the United States of America, the BBC legitimizes them.

THE BBC’s ‘BIG FISH’ STORY

On January 16th, 2013, the BBC published an article that intentionally misleads its readers about relationship of lawful gun ownership and violence both inside and outside of the United States of America. The article, titled US gun debate: Guns in numbers, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20759139 cherry picks data and intentionally omits facts in order to frame the U.S. as a violent “outlier … when compared with other highly developed countries.” They put their data in a slick little chart, threw in a few photos of semi-automatic weapons, and made it a fait accompli. America’s lawful gun culture is at the root of American violence. No further investigation needed.

THE PITS INSIDE THE BBCs CHERRIESTHE FIRST DECEPTION: The BBC is quick to point out that guns will kill 3.2 of every 100,000 Americans. That is over 30 times higher the United Kingdom’s extremely low rate of 0.1 gun deaths per 100,000! Ouch! What they fail to mention is that America’s overall death by violence rate is 6.5 per 100,000, and the U.K.’s overall rate of death by violence is 1.2 per 100,000. The Brits still kill each other, but simply do it without guns. Both countries are well below the global average of 11.47 violent deaths per 100,000.

THE SECOND DECEPTION: The BBC claims that “On a global scale, this rate puts the US 26th in the world, behind Honduras, El Salvador and Jamaica,” for murder. This is not a factual statement. Worldlifeexpectancy.com ranks 192 countries by their rate of death by violence. 91 countries have a higher rate of death by violence that the United States. Actually, it is Guinea, the former French colony, who is in 26th place with a rate of death by violence of 25.3 per 100,000. The law-abiding citizens of Guinea own so few firearms they make the Brits look like gun nuts.TRUTHFUL DATA POINTS

THE THIRD DECEPTION: The BBC next claims that, “when compared with other highly developed countries, the rate shows the U.S. as an outlier.” This is another false statement where the BBC cherry picks their data points. Yes, the U.S. is a bit high, but is lower than Estonia, and not a far cry from Finland and Latvia, who are all peaceful, developed countries. If any country is an “outlier” it is the U.K. Most countries where citizens have little right to bear arms have extraordinarily high violent death rates.

THE FOURTH DECEPTION: The BBC finally infers that the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, what they refer to as “Guns in Numbers” is the direct cause for high murder rates in the U.S. The BBC builds this grand falsehood on a foundation of misinformation and baseless claims – what my father would have referred to as a “whopper!”

First, the U.S. murder rate has dropped 50% in the last twenty years, while at the same time private gun ownership has risen by nearly 50%.

Second, about half of American murderers choose a means of killing other than guns.

Third, statistics show a disarmed population is usually at a higher risk of death by violence.

People are going to kill each other whether they have guns or not, and as the saying goes, “God made man, but Samuel Colt made them equal.” Criminals, terrorists, drug cartels, rebels, and corrupt governments all over the world arm themselves to the teeth with weapons often supplied through legal channels by one government or another. Taking away the right of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves simply creates a vast reservoir of potential victims. For example, Washington D.C. has some of the most restrictive firearms laws in the U.S. yet remains an intractable den of gun violence. Also, I am certain that the genocide in Rwanda would have had an entirely different outcome had all the victims owned the ability to defend themselves.THE HAND PICKED CHERRIES

SHAME ON THE BBC: Like it or not, journalists have an ethical responsibility to present honest, objective findings in the news. Readers believe, perhaps naïvely, that Journalists deal with them fairly and honestly, and take what journalists report as not only factual, but independent of government or cause. With great power comes great responsibility, and organizations such as the BBC have a moral obligation not to be the tool of, or mouthpiece for, any sociopolitical agenda, even if it is an agenda of their own creation. Maybe someone can buy the BBC a dictionary so they could look up the word, “shame.” After all, they own it.