Beaverton, OR: Local Traffic Court Judge, the Hon. Les Rink, Makes Landmark Civil Liberties Ruling

July 11, 2014. The City of Beaverton, Oregon, one of America’s leaders in the constitutionally questionable use of traffic-cams as a source of city revenue, is at it again. Local municipal court judge, the Hon. Les Rink, is using the bench to stretch Oregon law beyond its original intent.

Distracted driving is only a few hours younger than driving itself. When car radios first hit the scene over 75 years ago, government officials gave serious consideration to outright banning radios from cars for fear of distracted driving. With the rise of the cellular age came an increase in auto accidents and fatalities directly linked to the use of mobile phones while driving. In 2010 the State of Oregon, with citizen safety in mind, banned the use of hand-held cellular phones while driving with the idea of getting citizens to keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel. The sole intent of the law was to keep hands on the wheel and eyes on the road when the car was moving. You know what they say about the road to Hell.

In May 2014, Beaverton Police Officer, D. VanCleve, witnessed a motorist (not me, by the way) move their mobile phone from their lap to their center console. The officer pulled the motorist over and cited them for violating Oregon’s primary ban on Distracted Driving. The motorist protested, attempting to prove the lack of call history on the phone. The phone was not currently in use for speaking or texting. Officer VanCleve then inquired about the phone’s media playing capacity, noting that the phone was a blue-tooth enabled media player that was independently communicating with the car’s hands-free, Bluetooth audio system. Officer VanCleve stated this counted as “use of a communication device” and issued citation.

The motorist, now a defendant, believing that Officer VanCleve was misinterpreting the statute, entered a plea of not guilty and was issued a July 11 court date with the Hon. Les Rink. At the hearing the defendant produced cellular bills and the manual to the hands-free, Bluetooth system in the vehicle, demonstrating there was no active use of the mobile phone during the period of time in and around when Officer VanCleve issued the citation, and any potential use would have been hands-free in accordance with current public interpretation of Oregon’s distracted driving laws. Officer VanCleve quoted the law as any use of any device for “two-way communication” was illegal. The Hon. Les Rink sided with Officer VanCleve, a Beaverton policeman noted for ticketing motorists for using GPS units in their vehicles. The defendant was found guilty of violating Oregon’s Distracted Driving law because their phone was independently “communicating” with the car’s audio system. The City of Beaverton made $160 from the decision. From what I know of the case, this appears to be a common outcome in the Hon. Les Rink’s court.

The Hon. Les Rink is setting unchallenged legal precedents with his rulings in Beaverton’s Municipal Traffic Court. Oregon’s Distracted Driving law, originally meant to get drivers to stop talking and texting while driving, has radically evolved with the help of the Hon. Les Rink. It is now illegal for any driver in Oregon to actively or passively use any electronic device capable of any two-way communication while driving… at least in the jurisdiction of the City of Beaverton and Officer VanCleve. This includes media-players, GPS units, wi-fi enabled tablets, modern, integrated audio systems, and of course, any cellular device. The Hon. Les Rink has single-handedly, and with little challenge, called into question the legality of all hands-free devices. His rulings give tacit permission to any officer or deputy to ticket any motorist if they suspect any such device is in use in the vehicle… and it has nothing to do with holding the device in your hand and using it to talk or text. The device simply has to be turned on and engaged in some form of two-way communication with some other device.

This article is not meant to lambaste the Hon. Les Rink for gross misinterpretation of Oregon’s distracted driving laws and violating the civil liberties of Oregon’s citizens. America is a country of activist judges with a penchant for making law instead of enforcing or rationally interpreting law, so there is no rational expectation that this situation would be different. I am not advocating a class-action suit be brought against the City of Beaverton, nor an appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court. All I am simply doing is issuing a warning to Oregonians. New car dealerships also need to take heed, as most cars come equipped with potentially illegal audio equipment. Turn off your cell phones, GPS units, media players, tablets and the like before you step in your car and drive through Beaverton. It may be best for you to replace your current audio system with an antique AM/FM receiver circa 1970. If you don’t, and Officer C. VanCleve gives you a ticket, having both hands on the wheel and both eyes on the road will be no defense, and the City of Beaverton will help themselves to $160 of your hard-earned money.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Beaverton, OR: Local Traffic Court Judge, the Hon. Les Rink, Makes Landmark Civil Liberties Ruling

  1. jenny smith says:

    Just got a ticket for using my GPS on the entrance to Canyon from 217 coming from Portland. So upset it’s my fofourthurth ticket. Two for supposedly not stopping at a stop sign and other one for talking on my phone. The stop sign tickets are very questionable.

    On my last ticket for supposedly not stopping at a stop sign took place in McMinneville. The cop was a state sheriff and had a camera on him. He contradicted himself about the reasoning for the stop and the ticket and so I really wanted to go to court because I thought I had a good case with the camera and all. I got a lawyer and was going to go to court but then I got intimidated by, lets just say the entire process, in a sort of paper type way, that was so serious I will not even mention it,(and I cant prove they were tying to intimidate me), but I wasn’t going to take any chances so I just paid the ticket.

    This current cop, a Beaverton police officer, on a bike, said I could take a class, maybe, and have the ticket erased.

    I don’t trust Beaverton police. About a year ago a man pulled a gun on me and threatened me. I was scared for my life and called the police. The Beaverton police showed up arrested me and dropped all charges against the gun wielding psycho. They we’re trying to intimidate me to drop charges because I am a Latina and the psycho was white military with mental issues that he admitted to. He admitted to being mentally unstable and they dropped all charges against him. The charges against me were also dropped but they didn’t have any reason to arrest me in the first place!! If the psycho stranger ends up killing someone, Beaverton police are going to have some bad publicity on their hands cause I’ll go to the press and say they knowingly cause murders!

    I saved all documentation from my arrest. You have to pay $15 or so but they will give you a copy of the documentation. They also searched my car and conveniently left that out of the documentation so I had to re- request it and they gave me a watered down version of the events that transpired on the search.

  2. Dirk says:

    This judge, Les Rank is not honorable in any sense. He is old and about to retire and doesn’t care whose life he ruins as long as he gets his kick backs by spreading his non-sensical interpretations of the law!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s